Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (2024)

InIn the Harry Potter films, we loved seeing the different interpretations of how we imagined the characters on the page. Here are some of the most striking adaptations – and how they were described in the books.

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (1)

From Harry’s famous green eyes being changed to blue to Narcissa Malfoy’s unique two-tone ’do, here’s how the Harry Potter characters transformed from page to screen, and why they were reimagined for the films.

Harry Potter

How he’s described in the books…

Harry had a thin face, knobbly knees, black hair and bright-green eyes. He wore round glasses held together with a lot of Sellotape because of all the times Dudley had punched him on the nose. The only thing Harry liked about his own appearance was a very thin scar on his forehead which was shaped like a bolt of lightning. He had had it as long as he could remember and the first question he could ever remember asking his Aunt Petunia was how he had got it.
Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone


How he looks in the films

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (2)

Daniel Radcliffe certainly looks the part of Harry – with one minor exception. His Harry has blue eyes, while the books tell us time and time again of Harry’s green eyes – just like his mother’s. There’s a pretty simple reason for this, though. Radcliffe, who has blue eyes, couldn’t wear green contact lenses, as he was allergic.

Another detail that a lot of fans wondered about was the placement of the lightning bolt scar. Although the books never specify exactly where on the forehead Harry’s is – we all surely pictured it being in the centre – Daniel Radcliffe’s scar was placed to the side. But don’t worry, this was all J.K. Rowling’s decision, who told director Christopher Columbus to make it ‘razor sharp, just off centre’.

Kingsley Shacklebolt

How he’s described in the books…

Kingsley Shacklebolt swooped around him, bald pate and earring gleaming slightly in the moonlight ...
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows


How he looks in the films

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (3)

In the books, we don’t learn much about this stoic Auror’s appearance at all. We know he’s tall, black, bald and wears an earring – and the rest is left to our imagination. In the movies, actor George Harris decided to add some African flair to Kingsley’s outfit.

‘I came down to a fitting,’ Harris said, ‘and I was wearing an Agbada, which is a Nigerian ceremonial gown. Underneath that, I had on a pair of Kota trousers, like Indian pyjamas.’

Costume designer Jany Temime was inspired by Harris’s outfit, and decided to incorporate it into Kingsley’s look. Harris/Shacklebolt was also given a specially made Nigerian-style cap, which reflected light from different angles.

Harris said that he felt the hat would ‘keep Shacklebolt’s power from escaping. He has a quiet strength and wants to keep a lid on it.’

You’ve got to hand it to Kingsley Shacklebolt. He’s got style.

Hermione Granger

How she’s described in the books…

She had a bossy sort of voice, lots of bushy brown hair and rather large front teeth.
Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone


How she looks in the films

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (4)

Before getting her teeth shortened by Madam Pomfrey and discovering Sleekeazy’s Hair Potion, Hermione was known in the earlier Harry Potter books for having bushy hair and big teeth. In the films, Emma Watson’s Hermione has a slightly different spin: her hair is more wavy than bushy, and her teeth are normal-sized – for the most part. Christopher Columbus and Watson did indeed try out fake teeth in the first film, but the director quickly realised this was impractical.

Narcissa Malfoy

How she’s described in the books…

Narcissa gave a little scream of despair and clutched at her long blonde hair.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince


How she looks in the films

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (5)

Like the rest of the Malfoys, Draco’s mother Narcissa is described as having blonde hair. She’s also described as looking like she constantly has dung under her nose, but that might just be Harry’s, um, unique interpretation. Nonetheless, in the film, Helen McCrory’s hair was presented in an unusual two-tone style – partly blonde, partly black.

The idea for this was to give Narcissa a little bit of her sister’s look – Bellatrix Lestrange, played by Helena Bonham Carter, has dark hair.

‘We tried different types of blonde hair, and different configurations, and finally, we came up with this,’ said Lisa Tomblin, hair designer for the Harry Potter films.

Helen McCrory also thought the hair suited Narcissa, seeing her as a highly fashionable witch who was ‘recognisably chic’.

Nymphadora Tonks

How she’s described in the Harry Potter books…

She looked the youngest there; she had a pale heart-shaped face, dark twinkling eyes, and short spiky hair that was a violent shade of violet. ‘Wotcher, Harry!’
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix


How she looks in the films

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (6)

Well, obviously Tonks is a tricky one, due to her being a Metamorphmagus… Nonetheless, Nymphadora Tonks, as played by Natalia Tena in the films, did have a distinct look that complemented her book counterpart – and she also kept the wild, purple hair.

Costume designer Jany Temime honoured Tonks’s punky look, and added a few extras for good measure, as if to properly showcase Tonks’s personality. For example, Natalia Tena was given boots to wear to ‘trip her up’ – a homage to Tonks’s clumsiness in the books. But her outfits also reflected her role as a fierce Auror. During the battle at the Department of the Mysteries, for example, she is dressed in a long red coat with military tailoring. ‘She’s ready for battle,’ Tena said of the look, ‘but she still looks cool.’

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (7)
Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (8)

Originally published onPottermore

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (9)

More from the Wizarding World

FeatureWhy Latin was so important to the Harry Potter books
FeatureWhat if Harry, Ron and Hermione had never made friends in Philosopher’s Ston...
QuizThe Harry Potter Film Binge Quiz
FeatureThings we notice watching Harry Potter films ten years on

More from the Wizarding World

FeatureWhy Latin was so important to the Harry Potter books
FeatureWhat if Harry, Ron and Hermione had never made friends in Philosopher’s Ston...
QuizThe Harry Potter Film Binge Quiz
FeatureThings we notice watching Harry Potter films ten years on

Harry Potter to Fantastic Beasts

Discover the films

Harry Potter Characters: Book Description vs Film Appearance | Wizarding World (2024)

FAQs

How is Harry Potter's appearance described in the book? ›

“Harry had always been small and skinny for his age… Harry had a thin face, knobbly knees, black hair and bright green eyes. He wore round glasses held together with a lot of cellotape because of all the times Dudley had punched him in the nose.

How different are the Harry Potter books compared to the movies? ›

The "Harry Potter" films are based on a book series, but some details and plots are different. Some important characters who didn't make the cut include Peeves and Winky. The movies also don't explain what a Squib is or how Fred and George got the money for their shop.

What is the physical description of Hermione Granger in the book? ›

Appearance. The books describe Hermione as having "bushy brown hair" and brown eyes. Her front buck teeth, already very large, grow uncontrollably in Goblet of Fire after she is affected by a spell cast by Draco Malfoy.

What is Ron Weasley's physical description? ›

Outward appearance

Rowling introduces Ron as "tall, thin and gangling, with freckles, big hands and feet, and a long nose." Ron has the trademark red hair of the Weasleys and is indeed one of Harry's tallest schoolmates, even outgrowing some of his older brothers.

How is Draco Malfoy described in the books? ›

Draco is characterised as a cowardly bully who tricks and hurts people to get what he wants; he is also a cunning user of magic.

Are the Harry Potter books more detailed than the movies? ›

It's true that the Harry Potter books can include more details about the story because they have more space and time to explore certain characters and plots. However, films can do more with body language, music, and visual effects, which allows for better character development and world-building.

What is the biggest difference between a book and a movie? ›

The biggest difference between the two is that movies give viewers visuals to focus on while books challenge readers to imagine and interpret the story in their own unique way. This and other differences can make one medium better at telling a story or providing a better form of entertainment.

What is the difference between Hermione in the books and the movies? ›

From GoF and forward the movies changed her iconic “bushy brown” hair that is supossed to be messy because Hermione doesn't care about her appearence AND is really bad at selfcare (she says so herfself, how to straighen her hair is too time consuming after the Yule Ball, and while she enjoyed looking pretty, isn't ...

What is Ginny Weasley supposed to look like? ›

Outward appearance

She has typical Weasley traits: flaming red hair (which she wears in a long mane) and a freckled complexion. She is of petite stature, commented on by several characters, and has bright brown eyes like her mother.

How is Ginny Weasley described in the books? ›

In the books, the youngest of the Weasley children is a very strong, feisty and dynamic character, whereas in the films she has been portrayed as sort of a pushover without any personality of her own.

What was Fleur Delacour supposed to look like? ›

Due to her part-Veela heritage, Fleur was a breathtakingly beautiful witch, and hence caught a good deal of attention from many males. She was tall and willowy, with an air of grace that made her seem like she was gliding when she was walking, and her very presence seemed to "emanate a faint, silvery glow".

What does Ron look like in the books? ›

Ron: Flaming red hair, freckles, gangly, tall, ocean blue eyes.

How is Luna Lovegood described in the books? ›

Luna Lovegood is a fictional character in the Harry Potter book series by J. K. Rowling. She first appears in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, where she is described as having straggly, waist-length dirty-blonde hair and a dazed, dreamy look on her face.

What is the physical description of Luna Lovegood in the book? ›

Physical appearance

In 1997, sixteen-year-old Luna had waist-length, straggly, dirty blonde hair, protuberant grey eyes, which often seemed to be dreamily distracted, and faint eyebrows. She had an aura of "distinct dottiness" about her and was known to put her wand behind her left ear for safekeeping.

How is Harry Potter described in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone? ›

An 11-year-old orphan living with his unwelcoming aunt, uncle, and cousin, who learns of his own fame as a wizard known to have survived his parents' murder at the hands of the dark wizard Lord Voldemort as an infant when he is accepted to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

What does Hogwarts look like in Harry Potter? ›

Hogwarts School, located somewhere in the Highlands of Scotland, consisted of the large Hogwarts Castle and extensive school grounds surrounding it, which included sloping lawns, flowerbeds, vegetable patches, as well as a loch (called the Black Lake), a large dense forest (called the Forbidden Forest), several ...

Does J.K. Rowling make an appearance in Harry Potter? ›

No. She was offered, but refused. She was reputed to, but it's an urban legend. JK Rowling did not appear in any of the Harry Potter movies, as she is not an actor.

How tall is Harry Potter in the books? ›

Daniel Radcliffe is 5'5" - shorter and stockier - in contrast to a taller, lankier Harry (5'8") in the books. Harry is also the same height as Hermione in the films. Rupert Grint is 5'10" - also shorter and stockier - in contrast to a taller, lankier Ron (6'3") in the books.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 5764

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.